tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4800938683262569469.post9127161227885116308..comments2024-03-14T01:11:49.757-06:00Comments on chasing the long white cloud: Some Notes on Copyright Law and Academic PublishingTylerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08502527563795165435noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4800938683262569469.post-13948247562807798852013-10-31T13:16:00.912-06:002013-10-31T13:16:00.912-06:00.
And, speaking of the US, I think the Constituti....<br /><br />And, speaking of the US, I think the Constitution's requirement for copyright was designed decidedly NOT to lock words and phrases up forever.Th.https://www.blogger.com/profile/16460795570237872290noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4800938683262569469.post-13403947629977025192013-10-28T22:36:53.103-06:002013-10-28T22:36:53.103-06:00I agree, on all points, including the liberal defi...I agree, on all points, including the liberal definition of fair use, which I draw upon fairly heavily in Field Notes (I did ask permission of the poets I quote extensively) and which has been influenced by and sparked my interest in remix culture.<br /><br />I'm all for supporting creators, but I also wish we could establish a culture (in the US especially) that was more open to sharing Tylerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08502527563795165435noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4800938683262569469.post-47157361536338869272013-10-28T18:10:09.166-06:002013-10-28T18:10:09.166-06:00.
My primary thought is that we've gone too f....<br /><br />My primary thought is that we've gone too far in transferring ownership to the creator. I'm all for copyright and I don't think information should be absolutely free, but I do believe that a large part of copyright is getting works into the public domain after a reasonable time. Because information ultimately belongs to the public, it's just licensed to the creator.<Th.https://www.blogger.com/profile/16460795570237872290noreply@blogger.com